India’s unilateral naming move in China’s Zangnan a self-deception, runs counter to improving ties, warn Chinese experts_我的网站
A |
A view of the high-grade highway from Lhasa to Nyingchi in Southwest China's Xizang Autonomous Region Photo: VCG Chinese experts on Sunday slammed India's latest move of identifying 27 locations in China's Zangnan area by their so-called standard names on its official map as self-deception, which runs counter to the improving momentum in bilateral relations and could complicate efforts to properly handle border issues. The Indian government on Friday said the updated Survey of India map included "four mountain passes and a high-altitude lake," and claimed that the move "is intended to ensure the correct identification of these places" and "improve public awareness of their geographical and historical significance," according to the Times of India. The claim came shortly after the 36th meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on China-India Border Affairs (WMCC) was held on August 6 in New Delhi. During the meeting, officials from both sides discussed issues including boundary delimitation, border management and control, mechanism building, and cross-border cooperation. They agreed to maintain communication through diplomatic and military channels and jointly safeguard peace and stability in the border areas, according to a statement released by the Chinese Foreign Ministry on Friday. China has been carrying out standardization of geographical names in the region for a long time. At a time when China-India relations are showing signs of improvement and leaders from both countries are expected to engage through multilateral platforms, any unilateral action by India that escalates the border situation shows no point and will not serve the broader interests of bilateral relations, Qian Feng, director of the Research Department at Tsinghua University's National Strategy Institute, told the Global Times on Sunday. Qian said India should avoid turning border issue into a larger dispute, as such actions could stifle the improving political ties between the two countries. Consistent position China's position on the Zangnan region is consistent. The area covers parts of Nyingchi and Shannan and is located in Southwest China's Xizang region, which has been China's territory since ancient times. Since 2017, China's Ministry of Civil Affairs has released six batches of standardized names for locations in Zangnan, with a total of 112 names announced as of April 2026. These names cover villages, mountain passes, rivers and peaks, accompanied by standardized Chinese and Tibetan names as well as geographic coordinates. The dispute over the region has a long historical background. The illegal "McMahon Line" drawn between China and India during the 1914 Simla Convention was never signed or recognized by successive Chinese governments and therefore has no legal validity. After China's Ministry of Civil Affairs published the sixth batch of names that should be used for places in Zangnan region on April 10, two days later, the spokesperson for India's Ministry of External Affairs expressed rejection to China assigning names to places in so-called "Arunachal Pradesh," adding that these actions detract from ongoing efforts to stabilize bilateral ties. Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a routine press briefing on April 14 that Zangnan region is China's territory. China does not recognize the so-called "Arunachal Pradesh" illegally set up by India. It is fully within China's sovereign rights for the Chinese government to issue standard names for some of the places in Zangnan. China-India relations are generally stable at the moment. China's commitment to improving and growing China-India relations has not changed. We hope the two sides will work in the same direction and act more in ways conducive to bilateral relations, Guo stressed. India's latest naming of 27 locations is a unilateral administrative move and does not alter the legal status of the area, Guo Xuetang, a professor at the center for South Asia and Indian Ocean Studies under Shanghai International Studies University, told the Global Times. According to Guo Xuetang, India's move is an attempt to strengthen its claim of control over the area and create additional leverage in future boundary negotiations. However, such actions have no practical meaning and will only undermine the atmosphere for negotiations between the two countries. Not merely from the perspective of international law, Zangnan region has culturally, religiously and historically been connected within Xizang, with close links between local communities and civilization, the expert stressed. Positive momentum Despite differences over the boundary issue, China and India have in recent months continued efforts to stabilize relations. In December 2024, China and India's representatives for boundary affairs reached a six-point consensus during talks. Last week, the Nathu La Pass, which was closed for six years, officially resumed operations, signaling a new phase of mutually beneficial cooperation and development in cross-border trade. During a meeting between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar on July 22 in Manila, the Philippines, Wang said China and India should consolidate the positive momentum in bilateral relations, and strengthen coordination and cooperation in international and regional affairs, while Jaishankar said India's positions on issues concerning Taiwan and Xizang have not changed, and that India respects China's sovereignty, Xinhua reported. In the past two years, leaders of China and India have met in Kazan, Russia, and Tianjin, China, and agreed that China and India are partners rather than rivals, and that their development should be viewed as opportunities rather than threats, Wang said. "India's latest move is essentially an attempt to reinforce its claims over disputed territory and counter China's sovereignty position, a move that amounts to self-deception. Unilateral name changes cannot alter the historical and legal facts surrounding the Zangnan region, nor can they shake China's resolve to safeguard its territorial sovereignty," Guo Xuetang said. The only way to resolve the China-India boundary issue is through equal negotiations and a fair settlement based on historical and legal principles, while unilateral actions that create tensions or change the status quo will only harm mutual trust and border stability, Guo said. 。
D | 数据提供了佐证。首批接入服务的试点品牌,618期间成交订单量环比增长360%,整体好评率较接入前提升16个百分点。截至目前,接入该服务体系的品牌已扩展至400余家。 “拆送装一体”的价值不在于步骤的简化,而在于将一系列“未知”转化为“已知”——上门时间可知、收费明细可知、旧品去向可知。
E | 消费决策的心理成本随之降低,被不确定性压制的换新需求得以释放。 城市地标谈论“流程说明书”,恰是因为城市里的消费者终于无需亲自研读流程说明书。
产品即服务:M60P的长期主义
服务回应“怎么换”,产品回答“换什么”。
F | 二者构成完整的品牌承诺。 箭牌M60P智能马桶的研发逻辑,与“拆送装一体”的服务哲学同源——将复杂性内化,将简洁性外化。 在洁净维度,M60P构建了覆盖进水至出水全环节的防护体系。水路UVC杀菌、喷枪电解水除菌、喷嘴UVC杀菌三层串联,配合SIAA认证抗菌座圈,形成从水质到接触面的多层级保障。 针对中国多数地区水质偏硬、水垢沉积影响长期使用效能的现实,M60P搭载长效阻垢3.0技术。
G | 该技术通过FOF因子从化学层面包裹水中钙镁离子,抑制水垢晶核形成。实验室条件下阻垢率达95%,理想工况下可维持长达六年免更换维护。 净釉泡沫盾支持落座、脚感多模式触发,即便在0.02MPa低水压工况下仍可输出绵密泡沫,兼顾防溅、隔臭、润壁、防挂污多重效果。双泵增压冲水系统兼顾冲刷力与静音表现,适配高层住宅、老旧小区等多样水压环境。微波感应自动开合、高速速烘2.0、铂金除臭等功能,共同构成完整的智能卫浴解决方案。 产品功能的背后,是品牌对“长期使用体验”的持续投入。正如箭牌2026品牌故事片《再好一点》所传递的价值主张:将产品做好一点,让生活再舒服一点。